Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: experiments in query optimization

From: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
To: Faheem Mitha <faheem(at)email(dot)unc(dot)edu>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: experiments in query optimization
Date: 2010-03-31 09:29:58
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>>> work_mem = 1 GB (see diag.{tex/pdf}).
> Sure, but define sane setting, please. I guess part of the point is that I'm 
> trying to keep memory low

You're trying to keep memory usage low, but you have work_mem set to 1GB?


"Prove to thyself that all circuits that radiateth and upon which thou worketh
 are grounded, lest they lift thee to high-frequency potential and cause thee
 to radiate also. "             -- The Ten Commandments of Electronics

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Faheem MithaDate: 2010-03-31 09:36:11
Subject: Re: experiments in query optimization
Previous:From: Artiom MakarovDate: 2010-03-31 07:42:29
Subject: Re: temp table "on commit delete rows": transaction overhead

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group