Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: memory question

From: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
To: "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: memory question
Date: 2010-03-25 10:35:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Campbell, Lance wrote:
> I have 24 Gig of memory on my server...
> Our server manager seems to think that I have way to much memory.  He
> thinks that we only need 5 Gig.

You organisation probably spent more money getting your server manager to 
investigate how much RAM you need and scaring you about wasting resources, 
than it would cost to just slap 24GB in the machine.

24GB is the least amount of RAM I would consider putting in a new server 
nowadays. It's so cheap.


 Lord grant me patience, and I want it NOW!

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tadipathri RaghuDate: 2010-03-25 15:01:18
Subject: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB
Previous:From: Dave CrookeDate: 2010-03-25 06:28:24
Subject: Re: memory question

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group