Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: GiST index performance

From: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Subject: Re: GiST index performance
Date: 2009-04-22 16:06:25
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> I will post a patch when I have ported my bioseg code over to the seg data 
> type.

Here is my patch ported over to the seg contrib package, attached. Apply 
it to seg.c and all should be well. A similar thing needs to be done to 
cube, but I haven't looked at that.


 An optimist sees the glass as half full, a pessimist as half empty,
 and an engineer as having redundant storage capacity.

Attachment: seg.c_patch
Description: text/plain (6.7 KB)

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Glenn MaynardDate: 2009-04-22 19:33:21
Subject: Re: performance for high-volume log insertion
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2009-04-22 15:19:06
Subject: Re: performance for high-volume log insertion

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group