From: | "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgAdmin III] #148: Miscellaneous requests for the query tool |
Date: | 2010-03-21 17:53:03 |
Message-ID: | ae46fee11003211053p6993358eqe0d7180ca7731336@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
2010/3/20 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>:
> Applies and compiles with no issue.
Good!
> Anyways there are a few things that I don't like.
I'm already wainting for. :-)
> When the combobox contains the maximum number of queries, it should
> delete the older one and record the new one whereas now it simply
> doesn't do anything.
Yes, i was in doubt whether I delete the oldest query or not, but your
review answers my doubt.
> What happens when pgAdmin loads a queries file with more than the
> maximum number of queries in it? AFAICT, it loads everything. I think it
> shouldn't. It should only load the X last one (X being the maximum
> number of queries).
I agree.
> I don't think the default maximum query size is sane. 100 characters are
> really not enough. At least 1024 (much like track_activity_query_size).
> By the way, I also don't think we should talk in bytes. It's a number of
> characters.
Sounds better for me, too.
> I think that's all for me. Can you send us an updated patch?
Yes, I can.
> Thanks a lot.
Thank you too.
[]s
Dickson S. Guedes
mail/xmpp: guedes(at)guedesoft(dot)net - skype: guediz
http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashesh Vashi | 2010-03-22 04:47:16 | Re: What we still have to do for 1.12 |
Previous Message | pgAdmin Trac | 2010-03-21 16:34:36 | Re: [pgAdmin III] #142: Support for SQL/Med objects |