| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Online checksums patch - once again |
| Date: | 2020-04-08 14:24:19 |
| Message-ID: | ab108c32-32db-eb59-d37d-45e77480180e@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/1/20 11:30 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 1/18/20 6:18 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>
>> Attached is a v16 rebased on top of current master which addresses the
>> above
>> commented points, and which I am basing the concurrency work on.
>
> This patch no longer applies cleanly:
> http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_27_2260.log
>
> The CF entry has been updated to Waiting on Author.
>
> Regards,
There has been review on this patch but no updates in some time. As far
as I can see there's debate on how to mark relations as fully
checksummed and/or how to resume.
I'm marking this patch Returned with Feedback. Please feel free to
resubmit when it is again ready for review.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mahendra Singh Thalor | 2020-04-08 14:24:49 | Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2020-04-08 14:10:37 | Re: adding partitioned tables to publications |