Re: A small problem when rehashing catalog cache

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: cca5507 <cca5507(at)qq(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A small problem when rehashing catalog cache
Date: 2026-01-08 00:07:01
Message-ID: aV71JSl4Xcntl5vc@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 03:30:43PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> I suspect it doesn't make much difference in the grand scheme of
> things, but the code has to do either one thing or the other, so +1 to
> do the more sensible thing.

Thanks for the input. I have applied the change as 68119480a763 on
HEAD, after adding a comment to document the expectation.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2026-01-08 00:18:50 Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2026-01-07 23:46:46 Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart