| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: create table like including storage parameter |
| Date: | 2025-10-24 17:48:31 |
| Message-ID: | aPu77xiPRJaIlc49@nathan |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 08:28:45PM -0500, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Sunday, September 28, 2025, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Since we already support INCLUDING STORAGE, I’m not sure that
>> INCLUDING STORAGE PARAMETER is the right syntax to go with.
>
> I’d just call it “including parameters”; sure, all of the existing ones are
> storage related, but if there were non-storage ones we’d include those as
> well, so qualifying with a parameter type doesn’t seem correct.
+1
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-10-24 17:55:24 | Re: Bug in pg_stat_statements |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2025-10-24 17:26:20 | Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats() |