Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Mircea Cadariu <cadariu(dot)mircea(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Pierrick Chovelon <pierrick(dot)chovelon(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals
Date: 2025-10-09 08:11:30
Message-ID: aOduMhlmcRhnOYVa@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 11:34:34AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I think that the first
> correct step would be to get some coverage in, reversing the order of
> the patches.

So, coming back to this thread. Could somebody realign the TAP tests
for HEAD so as we have some test coverage to track which temp file is
unlinked by which query when a portal is dropped?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2025-10-09 08:14:09 Re: speedup COPY TO for partitioned table.
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2025-10-09 08:07:21 Re: Optimize LISTEN/NOTIFY