| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Jesper Pedersen <jesperpedersen(dot)db(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> | 
| Subject: | Re: pg_rewind: Doc update for PostgreSQL 18 | 
| Date: | 2025-06-09 19:15:02 | 
| Message-ID: | aEcytp-EiqZ3uSsM@nathan | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 01:38:09PM -0400, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
>     <application>pg_rewind</application> requires that the target server either has
>     the <xref linkend="guc-wal-log-hints"/> option enabled
>     in <filename>postgresql.conf</filename> or data checksums enabled when
> -   the cluster was initialized with <application>initdb</application>.  Neither of these
> -   are currently on by default.  <xref linkend="guc-full-page-writes"/>
> +   the cluster was initialized with <application>initdb</application>.  Data checksums
> +   are enabled by default starting from PostgreSQL 18.  <xref linkend="guc-full-page-writes"/>
>     must also be set to <literal>on</literal>, but is enabled by default.
+1 for fixing this, but I'd like to bikeshed on the wording a bit.  I think
the above proposal loses information since it doesn't mention that
wal_log_hints is off by default.  But it might be tricky to work in all
those details in a readable fashion.  How about we change it to something
like this:
	pg_rewind requires that the target server has full_page_writes enabled
	and at least one of either wal_log_hints or data checksums (see Section
	28.2) enabled. full_page_writes and data checksums are enabled by
	default, but wal_log_hints is not.
I think we ordinarily try to avoid too many version notes in the docs, and
I see that initdb makes no mention of the fact that the default for data
checksums changed in v18, so my first instinct is to leave that out.
-- 
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-06-09 19:29:31 | Re: Batch TIDs lookup in ambulkdelete | 
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-06-09 19:04:43 | Re: strange perf regression with data checksums |