From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jesper Pedersen <jesperpedersen(dot)db(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Subject: | Re: pg_rewind: Doc update for PostgreSQL 18 |
Date: | 2025-06-09 19:15:02 |
Message-ID: | aEcytp-EiqZ3uSsM@nathan |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 01:38:09PM -0400, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
> <application>pg_rewind</application> requires that the target server either has
> the <xref linkend="guc-wal-log-hints"/> option enabled
> in <filename>postgresql.conf</filename> or data checksums enabled when
> - the cluster was initialized with <application>initdb</application>. Neither of these
> - are currently on by default. <xref linkend="guc-full-page-writes"/>
> + the cluster was initialized with <application>initdb</application>. Data checksums
> + are enabled by default starting from PostgreSQL 18. <xref linkend="guc-full-page-writes"/>
> must also be set to <literal>on</literal>, but is enabled by default.
+1 for fixing this, but I'd like to bikeshed on the wording a bit. I think
the above proposal loses information since it doesn't mention that
wal_log_hints is off by default. But it might be tricky to work in all
those details in a readable fashion. How about we change it to something
like this:
pg_rewind requires that the target server has full_page_writes enabled
and at least one of either wal_log_hints or data checksums (see Section
28.2) enabled. full_page_writes and data checksums are enabled by
default, but wal_log_hints is not.
I think we ordinarily try to avoid too many version notes in the docs, and
I see that initdb makes no mention of the fact that the default for data
checksums changed in v18, so my first instinct is to leave that out.
--
nathan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-06-09 19:29:31 | Re: Batch TIDs lookup in ambulkdelete |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-06-09 19:04:43 | Re: strange perf regression with data checksums |