Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Explain explained

From: "Markus Stocker" <markus(at)wilabs(dot)ch>
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Explain explained
Date: 2008-03-04 14:53:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-novice

I'm trying to figure out how to interpret the query plan explanation
returned by postgresql. There are a couple things that I can't explain
to myself, so help is appreciated.

This is the query plan returned by the query I'm inspecting.

 Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..450.39 rows=1 width=128)
   ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..444.71 rows=1 width=140)
         ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..443.72 rows=1 width=148)
               ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..442.40 rows=1 width=80)
                     ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..440.28 rows=1 width=72)
                           ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..438.97 rows=1 width=4)
                                 ->  Seq Scan on individual_name
name_0  (cost=0.00..430.68 rows=1 width=4)
                                       Filter: (name =
                                 ->  Index Scan using
object_role_assertion_b_role_idx on object_role_assertion ora_0
(cost=0.00..8.28 rows=1 width=8)
                                       Index Cond: (( =
ora_0.b) AND (ora_0.object_role = 69))
                           ->  Index Scan using individual_name_pkey
on individual_name name_1  (cost=0.00..1.30 rows=1 width=68)
                                 Index Cond: ( = ora_0.a)
                     ->  Index Scan using
object_role_assertion_b_role_idx on object_role_assertion ora_1
(cost=0.00..2.10 rows=1 width=8)
                           Index Cond: ((ora_0.a = ora_1.b) AND
(ora_1.object_role = 44))
               ->  Index Scan using individual_name_pkey on
individual_name name_2  (cost=0.00..1.30 rows=1 width=68)
                     Index Cond: ( = ora_1.a)
         ->  Index Scan using concept_assertion_pkey on
concept_assertion ca_0  (cost=0.00..0.98 rows=1 width=4)
               Index Cond: ((ca_0.concept = 5) AND (ca_0.individual = ora_1.a))
   ->  Index Scan using concept_assertion_pkey on concept_assertion
ca_1  (cost=0.00..5.67 rows=1 width=4)
         Index Cond: ((ca_1.concept = 20) AND (ora_0.a = ca_1.individual))

Now, the first question is, how to read this. My understanding is that
the plan contains some nested loops and the first constrain is on the
table individual_name by filtering the name attribute with the value This is done by a sequential scan. Next we
have an index scan on object_role_assertion using the
object_role_assertion_b_role_idx. The result set returned by the
sequential and index scan is then joined with the index scan on
individual_name using individual_name_pkey with the constrain = ora_0.a ... and so on.

If this sequence is correct, I'm wondering about the following:

1/ How does postgresql know that the constrain =
'' matches one row (which is in fact true)?
I'm aware that databases rely on statistics of data distribution but
it doesn't seem possible to me to exactly know the statistics about
each possible value for attributes. Further, why expects postgresql
for each operation a row size of 1?

2/ Sequential scans seem to me more expensive compared to index scans.
I'm wondering why the sequential scan on individual_name is the first
executed in the plan. Having or not having an index on doesn't change anything to the query plan. Why?

3/ There is one condition in the query, i.e. concept_assertion.concept
= 5 with an empty result set, i.e. selectivity 0. In fact, the last
index scan on concept_assertion ca_1 in the plan is never executed
(this is what 'explain analyze' tells me). I'm wondering, why this
constrain is not executed first. By executing this first, we could
just never execute everything else. Postgresql seems to have
fine-grained statistics, why does it get the estimate for = '' exactly and is
wrong on concept_assertion.concept = 5?

I did execute analyze before.

Thanks for your explanations,


pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Rodrigo E. De León PlicetDate: 2008-03-04 15:21:07
Subject: Re: Explain explained
Previous:From: Vyacheslav KalininDate: 2008-03-04 09:51:01
Subject: Re: SQL Question

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group