-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> However, I can only reasonably manage Techdocs if it's on a production-ready
> Content Management System, with simplified page editing, multi-user rights
> management, and revision history.
Call me a traditionalist, but how about the traditional cvs + "your favorite editor"
approach? I don't think the techdocs section changes so often that we need
fancy wiki / edit-from-the-web-on-the-fly sort of technology here. I also agree
with Marc that there is no need to move it elsewhere right now. Let's just keep
it simple, focus on the content, and add other things later.
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200304140946
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2003-04-14 14:29:49|
|Subject: Re: Tech Docs and Consultants|
|Previous:||From: justin||Date: 2003-04-14 13:44:22|
|Subject: Fwd: A within the next day or two request for a PostgreSQL contact from advocacy.postgresql.org|