| From: | greg(at)turnstep(dot)com |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Date: | 2003-04-14 13:48:45 |
| Message-ID: | a90b1033991b464ffd0f4997a5193f24@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> However, I can only reasonably manage Techdocs if it's on a production-ready
> Content Management System, with simplified page editing, multi-user rights
> management, and revision history.
Call me a traditionalist, but how about the traditional cvs + "your favorite editor"
approach? I don't think the techdocs section changes so often that we need
fancy wiki / edit-from-the-web-on-the-fly sort of technology here. I also agree
with Marc that there is no need to move it elsewhere right now. Let's just keep
it simple, focus on the content, and add other things later.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200304140946
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
iD8DBQE+mrwvvJuQZxSWSsgRAvMtAJ9CrkU1WgOf5SafG8l4aJYJpsWOfACgsCHI
C+DCSdHAkMnhFmIu9ctw2dA=
=ZhMl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-04-14 14:29:49 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Previous Message | justin | 2003-04-14 13:44:22 | Fwd: A within the next day or two request for a PostgreSQL contact from advocacy.postgresql.org |