Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option
Date: 2021-03-25 15:15:10
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/26/21 11:29 AM, Surafel Temesgen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:39 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
> Sorry for the dealy. I started to look this.
> Hi kyotaro,
> Thanks for looking into this but did we agree to proceed
> on this approach? I fear that it will be the west of effort if
> Andrew comes up with the patch for his approach.
> Andrew Gierth: Are you working on your approach?

[Added Andrew to recipients]

Andrew, would you care to comment?


In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-03-25 15:16:37 Re: [PATCH] pg_permissions
Previous Message torikoshia 2021-03-25 14:45:17 Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process