Re: drop postmaster symlink

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)karlpinc(dot)com>
Cc: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: drop postmaster symlink
Date: 2023-01-27 07:47:37
Message-ID: a623ef37-8b73-dcc2-12a4-fa499097d5c1@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26.01.23 19:36, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>> I see a possible problem at line 1,412 of runtime.sgml
> This says:
>
> in the postmaster's startup script just before invoking the postmaster.
>
> Depending on how this is read, it could be interpreted to mean
> that a "postmaster" binary is invoked. It might be more clear
> to write: ... just before invoking <command>postgres</command>.
>
> Or it might not be worth bothering about; at this point, probably
> not, but I thought you might want the heads-up anyway.

Good find. I have adjusted that, and a few more nearby.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-01-27 07:49:15 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2023-01-27 07:18:43 Re: Syncrep and improving latency due to WAL throttling