Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: 高增琦 <pgf00a(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2016-12-28 01:41:17
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/12/27 19:07, Amit Langote wrote:
> Attached should fix that.

Here are the last two patches with additional information like other
patches. Forgot to do that yesterday.


Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Set-ecxt_scantuple-correctly-for-tuple-routing.patch text/x-diff 3.5 KB
0002-No-BulkInsertState-when-tuple-routing-is-in-action.patch text/x-diff 1.8 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2016-12-28 01:41:56 Re: Hooks
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2016-12-28 01:33:13 Re: Hooks