Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs
Date: 2024-06-03 19:04:19
Message-ID: Zl4TswfwPUZkHHfn@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 12:18:21PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 11:15:14PM +0000, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
>> As far as backpatching the present inconsistencies in the docs,
>> [0] looks good to me.
> Committed.

Of course, as soon as I committed this, I noticed another missing reference
to max_wal_senders in the paragraph about POSIX semaphores. I plan to
commit/back-patch the attached patch within the next couple days.


Attachment Content-Type Size
add_missing_max_wal_sender_reference.patch text/plain 904 bytes

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2024-06-03 19:08:52 Re: allow changing autovacuum_max_workers without restarting
Previous Message Andres Freund 2024-06-03 18:58:11 Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility