Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Date: 2024-02-23 14:11:49
Message-ID: ZdinpYniQ+yt3M0g@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 09:30:58AM +0000, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
> On Friday, February 23, 2024 5:07 PM Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 02:15:11PM +0530, shveta malik wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the details. I understand it now. We do not use '=' in our
> > > main slots-fetch query but we do use '=' in remote-validation query.
> > > See validate_remote_info().
> >
> > Oh, right, I missed it during the review.
> >
> > > Do you think instead of doing the above, we can override search-path
> > > with empty string in the slot-sync case.
> > > SImilar to logical apply worker and autovacuum worker case (see
> > > InitializeLogRepWorker(), AutoVacWorkerMain()).
> >
> > Yeah, we should definitively ensure that any operators being used in the query
> > is coming from the pg_catalog schema (could be by setting the search path or
> > using the up-thread proposal).
> >
> > Setting the search path would prevent any risks in case the query is changed
> > later on, so I'd vote for changing the search path in validate_remote_info() and
> > in synchronize_slots() to be on the safe side.
>
> I think to set secure search path for remote connection, the standard approach
> could be to extend the code in libpqrcv_connect[1], so that we don't need to schema
> qualify all the operators in the queries.
>
> And for local connection, I agree it's also needed to add a
> SetConfigOption("search_path", "" call in the slotsync worker.
>
> [1]
> libpqrcv_connect
> ...
> if (logical)
> ...
> res = libpqrcv_PQexec(conn->streamConn,
> ALWAYS_SECURE_SEARCH_PATH_SQL);
>

Agree, something like in the attached? (it's .txt to not disturb the CF bot).

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-reset-search_path-for-slot-synchronization.txt text/plain 1.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2024-02-23 14:20:51 Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2024-02-23 12:35:38 Re: table inheritance versus column compression and storage settings