Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
Date: 2024-01-12 04:26:50
Message-ID: ZaC_iu7ao8v8VJ89@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 08:35:42AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> It also seems like you've missed this message, where this has been
> mentioned (spoiler: first version of the patch used an alternate
> output):
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZUnuzPimkZCOVEcz@paquier.xyz

The refactoring of 0001 has now been applied as of e72a37528dda, and
the buildfarm looks stable (at least for now).

Here is a rebased patch set of the rest.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
v9-0001-Add-backend-facility-for-injection-points.patch text/x-diff 23.1 KB
v9-0002-Add-test-module-injection_points.patch text/x-diff 13.9 KB
v9-0003-Add-regression-test-to-show-snapbuild-consistency.patch text/x-diff 4.7 KB
v9-0004-Add-basic-test-for-promotion-and-restart-race-con.patch text/x-diff 10.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-01-12 04:35:40 Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2024-01-12 04:14:30 reorganize "Shared Memory and LWLocks" section of docs