Re: Doesn't pgstat_report_wal() handle the argument "force" incorrectly

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ryoga Yoshida <bt23yoshidar(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doesn't pgstat_report_wal() handle the argument "force" incorrectly
Date: 2023-09-25 03:47:41
Message-ID: ZREC3d5Aya0KPbSl@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:27:27AM +0900, Ryoga Yoshida wrote:
> Thank you for the review. Certainly, adding a comments is a good idea. I
> added a comment.

Hmm. How about the attached version with some tweaks?
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0002-bug-fix-in-foce-within-pgstat_report_wal.patch text/x-diff 861 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-09-25 04:00:47 Re: Remove MSVC scripts from the tree
Previous Message Andy Fan 2023-09-25 03:35:17 Re: Report planning memory in EXPLAIN ANALYZE