| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgbf(at)twiska(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary |
| Date: | 2023-09-25 03:29:54 |
| Message-ID: | ZRD-smlSMRiEEzEZ@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:07:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:58 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>>> A bunch of architectures that are not Intel are failing. Here is a
>>> summary based on the buildfarm reports:
>>> mamba, macppc with gcc 10.4.0
>
> That one is mine, so let me know if there's something particular
> you'd like me to check.
That would help, thanks! Could it be possible to check if the
attached patch applied on HEAD influences the fate of the recovery
test 009_twophase.pl? That's one thing I am really doubting about,
and we've not done much since REL_16_STABLE has been forked..
(I'm still trying to get an environment where this can be reproduced,
but qemu takes time.)
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Revert-Optimize-WAL-insertion-lock-acquisition-and-r.patch | text/x-diff | 6.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2023-09-25 03:47:12 | Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-09-25 03:07:08 | Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary |