Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace?
Date: 2023-07-05 23:21:18
Message-ID: ZKX67iJ2MxQVCgap@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 02:29:27PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> },
> - {
> - {"db_user_namespace", PGC_SIGHUP, CONN_AUTH_AUTH,
> - gettext_noop("Enables per-database user names."),
> - NULL
> - },
> - &Db_user_namespace,
> - false,
> - NULL, NULL, NULL
> - },
> {

Removing the GUC from this table is kind of annoying. Cannot this be
handled like default_with_oids or ssl_renegotiation_limit to avoid any
kind of issues with the reload of dump files and the kind?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-07-05 23:34:00 Re: Consider \v to the list of whitespace characters in the parser
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-07-05 23:05:06 Re: Wrong syntax in feature description