Re: Introduce WAIT_EVENT_EXTENSION and WAIT_EVENT_BUFFER_PIN

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Introduce WAIT_EVENT_EXTENSION and WAIT_EVENT_BUFFER_PIN
Date: 2023-07-03 04:18:42
Message-ID: ZKJMIukTawiGESoo@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 02:58:42PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> FWIW, I'm OK with the patch, without the need to worry about the
> performance. Even if that's the case, we could just mark all these as
> inline and move on..

I am attempting to get all that done for the beginning of the
development cycle, so the first refactoring patch has been applied.
Now into the second, main one..
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-07-03 04:26:44 Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Previous Message jian he 2023-07-03 04:16:22 Re: Cleaning up array_in()