| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements |
| Date: | 2023-05-31 11:35:55 |
| Message-ID: | ZHcxG40D8seP12dd@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 09:26:25AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Simpler and consistent, nice. I don't have much more to add, so I
> have switched the patch as RfC.
While at PGcon, Andres has asked me how many sockets are in the
environment I used for the tests, and lscpu tells me the following,
which is more than 1:
CPU(s): 64
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-63
Core(s) per socket: 16
Socket(s): 2
NUMA node(s): 2
@Andres: Were there any extra tests you wanted to be run for more
input?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2023-05-31 12:34:49 | Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-05-31 11:01:44 | Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready |