Re: Fix fseek() detection of unseekable files on WIN32

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix fseek() detection of unseekable files on WIN32
Date: 2023-03-22 00:12:36
Message-ID: ZBpH9GHRHfph958p@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 07:06:22AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Not sure about this one. I have considered it and dirmod.c includes
> also bits for cygwin, while being aimed for higher-level routines like
> rename(), unlink() or symlink(). This patch is only for WIN32, and
> aimed for common parts in win32*.c code, so a separate file seemed a
> bit cleaner to me at the end.

By the way, do you think that we could be able to get a TAP test for
that? It does not seem that it needs to be that complicated, as long
as we use a pg_dump command that pipes its output to a pg_restore
command launched by system()?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2023-03-22 00:52:52 Re: Track IO times in pg_stat_io
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-03-21 23:59:19 Re: allow_in_place_tablespaces vs. pg_basebackup