|From:||Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>|
|To:||Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>|
|Cc:||PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Re: Daniel Gustafsson
> Do you think pg_recvlogical should support SIGTERM as well? (The signals which
> it does trap should be added to the documentation which just now says "until
> terminated by a signal" but that's a separate thing.)
Ack, that makes sense, added in the attached updated patch.
> pqsignal(SIGINT, sigint_handler);
> + pqsignal(SIGTERM, sigint_handler);
> Tiny nitpick, I think we should rename sigint_handler to just sig_handler as it
> does handle more than sigint.
I went with sigexit_handler since pg_recvlogical has also a
sighup_handler and "sig_handler" would be confusing there.
|Next Message||Bharath Rupireddy||2022-08-16 11:40:54||Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM|
|Previous Message||Peter Eisentraut||2022-08-16 11:23:27||Move NON_EXEC_STATIC from c.h|