Re: Is it correct to update db state in control file as "shutting down" during end-of-recovery checkpoint?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com, jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is it correct to update db state in control file as "shutting down" during end-of-recovery checkpoint?
Date: 2022-02-28 02:01:41
Message-ID: YhwtBezETlSPut2x@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:51:06AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> That sounds like we should reject the patch as we don't agree to its
> objective. If someday end-of-recovery checkpoints functionally
> diverge from shutdown checkpoints but leave (somehow) the transition
> alone, we may visit this again but it would be another proposal.

The patch has been already withdrawn in the CF app.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-02-28 02:02:09 Re: pg_stat_statements: remove redundant function call in pg_stat_statements_internal
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-02-28 01:51:06 Re: Is it correct to update db state in control file as "shutting down" during end-of-recovery checkpoint?