Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Date: 2022-01-11 07:14:25
Message-ID: Yd0uUcGyYJrEPshD@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:12:41PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Rebased patch to cool down the CF bot, as per the addition of
> --no-sync to pg_upgrade.

The CF bot is unhappy, so here is a rebase, with some typo fixes
reported by Justin offlist.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0001-Switch-tests-of-pg_upgrade-to-use-TAP.patch text/x-diff 28.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-01-11 07:41:58 Re: pg_upgrade should truncate/remove its logs before running
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2022-01-11 07:07:22 Patch: Code comments: why some text-handling functions are leakproof