Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Shinya Kato <Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Ken Kato <katouknl(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Suraj Khamkar <khamkarsuraj(dot)b(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion
Date: 2021-10-27 07:59:15
Message-ID: YXkG0+BhKFO4whcI@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:54:03PM +0900, Shinya Kato wrote:
> In my opinion, it is written in the documentation, so tab-completion of
> "PROCEDURAL"is good.

It does not mean that we need to add everything either, especially
here as there is a shorter option.

> How about a completion with "LANGUAGE" and "PROCEDURAL LANGUAGE", like
> "PASSWORD" and "ENCRYPTED PASSWORD" in CREATE ROLE?

This has been around for some time already, so I'd just leave those
parts be.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ronan Dunklau 2021-10-27 08:00:40 Re: pg_receivewal starting position
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2021-10-27 06:55:45 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys