Re: alter table set TABLE ACCESS METHOD

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: alter table set TABLE ACCESS METHOD
Date: 2021-07-27 07:38:48
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 04:41:54AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> It looks like one hunk was missing/uncommitted from the 0002 patch..

Okay, hearing nothing, I have looked again at 0001 and did some light
adjustments, mainly in the tests. I did not spot any issues in the
patch, so that looks good to go for me.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-ALTER-TABLE-.-SET-ACCESS-METHOD.patch text/x-diff 18.4 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dipesh Pandit 2021-07-27 07:43:00 Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2021-07-27 07:25:22 Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: pg_upgrade can result in early wraparound on databases with high transaction load