Re: DETAIL for wrong scram password

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: "jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com" <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DETAIL for wrong scram password
Date: 2021-04-08 10:59:02
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:49:00AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yes, you are right here. I missed the parts before
> mock_scram_secret() gets called and there are comments in the whole
> area. Hmm, at the end of the day, I think that would just have
> verify_client_proof() fill in logdetail when the client proof does not
> match, and use a wording different than what's proposed upthread to
> outline that this is a client proof mismatch.

Seeing no updates, this has been marked as RwF.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-04-08 11:11:21 Re: SQL-standard function body
Previous Message David Rowley 2021-04-08 10:54:47 Re: Binary search in ScalarArrayOpExpr for OR'd constant arrays