Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned index

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, 李杰(慎追) <adger(dot)lj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned index
Date: 2021-03-06 01:43:43
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:27:05AM -0500, David Steele wrote:
> It appears there are still some issues to be resolved with this patch, but
> the next step seems to be for you to have a look at Justin's most recent
> patch.

Not sure if I'll be able to do that by the end of this month. Looking
quicky at the patch, I am not much a fan of the new code path
introduced for the deletion of dependent objects in the partition
tree, so my gut is telling me that we need to think harder about the
problem at hand first.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2021-03-06 01:49:04 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2021-03-06 01:42:47 Re: contrib/cube - binary input/output handlers