| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: archive_command / pg_stat_archiver & documentation |
| Date: | 2021-03-01 07:36:53 |
| Message-ID: | YDyZlTvsVwIxNFIN@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Benoit Lobréau wrote:
> Done here : https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/3012/
Documenting that properly for the archive command, as already done for
restore_command, sounds good to me. I am not sure that there is much
point in doing a cross-reference to the archiving section for one
specific field of pg_stat_archiver.
For the second paragraph, I would recommend to move that to a
different <para> to outline this special case, leading to the
attached.
What do you think?
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| archiver-doc-v2.patch | text/x-diff | 936 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-03-01 07:50:28 | Re: proposal: schema variables |
| Previous Message | Dian M Fay | 2021-03-01 07:24:01 | [PATCH] postgres-fdw: column option to override foreign types |