Re: archive_command / pg_stat_archiver & documentation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: archive_command / pg_stat_archiver & documentation
Date: 2021-03-01 07:36:53
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Benoit Lobréau wrote:
> Done here :

Documenting that properly for the archive command, as already done for
restore_command, sounds good to me. I am not sure that there is much
point in doing a cross-reference to the archiving section for one
specific field of pg_stat_archiver.

For the second paragraph, I would recommend to move that to a
different <para> to outline this special case, leading to the

What do you think?

Attachment Content-Type Size
archiver-doc-v2.patch text/x-diff 936 bytes

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2021-03-01 07:50:28 Re: proposal: schema variables
Previous Message Dian M Fay 2021-03-01 07:24:01 [PATCH] postgres-fdw: column option to override foreign types