Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure
Date: 2022-11-01 00:30:13
Message-ID: Y2Bolda0nneFmoeG@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 09:14:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> I don't think we need separate definitions for frontend and backend,
>> since the contained Assert() will take care of the difference. So the
>> attached would be simpler.
>
> WFM.

Thanks, fine by me.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-11-01 00:56:37 Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-11-01 00:30:06 Re: Split index and table statistics into different types of stats