| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure |
| Date: | 2022-10-31 00:04:24 |
| Message-ID: | Y18RCGE+Lyl07HyN@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 09:36:23AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Would there be a use for that? It's currently only used in the atomics
> code.
Yep, but they would not trigger when using atomics in the frontend
code. We don't have any use for that in core on HEAD, still that
could be useful for some external frontend code? Please see the
attached.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| assert-align-frontend.patch | text/x-diff | 537 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2022-10-31 01:01:33 | Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-10-30 23:31:08 | Re: Use pg_pwritev_with_retry() instead of write() in dir_open_for_write() to avoid partial writes? |