Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks
Date: 2022-10-12 07:46:37
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 12:53:07PM +0500, Ibrar Ahmed wrote:
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 231.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 409 (offset 82 lines).
> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> src/include/storage/buf_internals.h.rej

With no rebase done since this notice, I have marked this entry as

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-12 07:53:45 Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-10-12 07:45:01 Re: libpq error message refactoring