Re: Table AM and DROP TABLE [ Was: Table AM and DDLs]

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Mats Kindahl <mats(at)timescale(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Table AM and DROP TABLE [ Was: Table AM and DDLs]
Date: 2022-10-12 07:39:43
Message-ID: Y0ZvP0pVZXJCgzIz@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 09:53:01AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> The CF entry for this patch doesn't currently apply and there has been a bunch
> of feedback on the approach. Mats, are you actually waiting for further
> feedback right now?

Okay, for now this has been marked as RwF.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-12 07:42:38 Re: Proposal: allow database-specific role memberships
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-12 07:37:12 Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15