Re: [PATCH] Fix alter subscription concurrency errors

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Jelte Fennema <Jelte(dot)Fennema(at)microsoft(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix alter subscription concurrency errors
Date: 2022-10-12 05:17:53
Message-ID: Y0ZOAabPrx0oV5SW@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 06:37:07PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Would it work to use get_object_address() instead? That would save
> having to write a lookup-and-lock function with a retry loop for each
> object type.

Jeite, this thread is waiting for your input. This is a bug fix, so I
have moved this patch to the next CF for now to keep track of it.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-12 05:19:25 Re: pg_get_constraintdef: Schema qualify foreign tables unless pretty printing is enabled
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-12 05:14:59 Re: collect_corrupt_items_vacuum.patch