Re: Allow +group in pg_ident.conf

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jelte Fennema <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allow +group in pg_ident.conf
Date: 2023-03-02 00:56:21
Message-ID: Y//0NYrpFXNLzu2Q@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 02:26:21PM -0500, Gregory Stark (as CFM) wrote:
> So I'll set it to "Waiting on Author" pending that new patchset...

There is still an entry as of https://commitfest.postgresql.org/42/4112/.
Support for group detection in pg_ident.conf has been added in efb6f4a
already, so I have switched this entry as committed. We were also
aware of Andrew's proposal on the other commit, and it was much easier
to just group everything together.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-03-02 00:59:44 Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-03-02 00:54:22 Re: typedef struct LogicalDecodingContext