| From: | Woodchuck Bill <bwr607(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why the current setup of pgsql.* and comp.databases.postresql.general are BROKEN |
| Date: | 2004-11-27 00:09:48 |
| Message-ID: | Xns95ADC2E153BA7bswr607h4@130.133.1.4 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Gary L. Burnore <gburnore(at)databasix(dot)com> wrote in
news:co8frd$ktk$1(at)blackhelicopter(dot)databasix(dot)com:
> I'm posting to a USENet group. I shouldn't be receiving an email from
> the list. If the groups had been generated as MODERATED newsgroups,
> my post wouldn't hit MY spool, then go to HIS server for some
> approval, later to appear a second time and AFTER I receive this
> STUPID message in email.
>
> Of course, he doesn't CARE.
Just think about how easy it would be for a forging troll to mailbomb
anyone he wanted to by flooding the newsgroup with posts under the victim's
spoofed e-mail address. This system is too vulnerable to abuse. The groups
should be moderated, for one. Second, Marc needs to decide whether he wants
the groups to be in pgsql.*, *or* comp.* ... not both. The lists and gating
methods should all be explained in detail on the final RFD, so they appear
on the CFV.
--
Bill
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kamil Kaczkowski | 2004-11-27 00:31:10 | Re: row-level deadlock problem |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-27 00:04:26 | Re: row-level deadlock problem |