Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

From: Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
To: "Shevland, Joseph (AU - Hobart)" <jshevland(at)deloitte(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date: 2001-10-23 23:14:53
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Hash: SHA1

On 23-Oct-2001 Shevland, Joseph (AU - Hobart) wrote:
>> Does anyone know if we could include ANT into our CVS and 
>> redistribute it in order to build the jdbc code?  Are their license 
>> incompatibilities between the Apache License and the PostgreSQL license
>> that would prevent this?
> Should be fine to do, as long as we include the Apache license that comes
> with Ant along with the distribution. Point 3 of the license states that we
> should add something like:
> "This product includes software developed by the Apache Software
> Foundation..."
> in the documentation too; I'm not sure if this is really necessary with Ant
> as its a build tool, but couldn't hurt I guess.

No, we're using the ant tool, not incorporating ant into our executable(s).  We
only need the license in the cvs part that includes ant.

Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>

D08C2F45:  28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51  3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see


In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-10-23 23:26:15
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Previous:From: Ned WolpertDate: 2001-10-23 22:12:16
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group