RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Andres Freund' <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: 'Önder Kalacı' <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com" <Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com" <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure
Date: 2022-12-07 05:59:14
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB586635DB5F1C5CE4660175FEF51A9@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Andres,

> This is failing on cfbot / CI, as have prior versions.

Thank you for notifying to me. I attached newer versions.

> The failure happens everywhere except on linux, so presumably there's some
> portability issue in the patch.

Yes, you are right. This feature can be used only for linux, and
previous patches seemed to have bad files.

> Note that you can test CI in your own repository, as explained in
> src/tools/ci/README

Thank you for your information. Actually I was in trouble because
I don't have such machines for developing postgres.
I have confirmed that newer patches could pass the test CI.

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

Attachment Content-Type Size
v20-0001-Add-PQConncheck-to-libpq.patch application/octet-stream 4.1 KB
v20-0002-postgres_fdw-add-postgres_fdw_verify_connection_.patch application/octet-stream 8.2 KB
v20-0003-add-test.patch application/octet-stream 569.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-12-07 06:01:02 Re: Question regarding "Make archiver process an auxiliary process. commit"
Previous Message Sravan Kumar 2022-12-07 05:58:23 Re: Question regarding "Make archiver process an auxiliary process. commit"