| From: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection? |
| Date: | 2006-05-15 18:52:41 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0605151151560.9581@discord.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's what I thought, but that doesn't seem to be what I'm observing. Of
>> course the NAS device only gets wedged about once every month or two, so it's
>> difficult to reproduce.
>
> If it's really a PG bug, it should be trivial to reproduce: put a long
> sleep in the archive-command script.
Thanks Tom. I'll try and reproduce on one of the other PG servers I have
available when I have a chance and get back to you if it looks like a possible
bug.
--
Jeff Frost, Owner <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-15 19:35:18 | Re: Synchronized Replication |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-15 18:33:43 | Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-15 19:17:18 | Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-15 18:33:43 | Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection? |