Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: Marco Colombo <pgsql(at)esiway(dot)net>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-04 09:26:33
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.61.0504041118390.14138@Megathlon.ESI
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

[Cc: list purged a bit]

On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 08:41:15PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> None on the server side (except PostgreSQL) which makes the
>> argument all that more powerful :)
>
> So what you're saying is that no database "sounds complete" because no
> database includes PHP as a procedural language.
>
> Sorry, but I don't buy it.

I do. Actually I think no database is complete because no one includes
LISP as a procedural language (pun on "procedural" intented).
(BTW, I have no idea if a pl/LISP module ever existed.)

.TM.
--
____/ ____/ /
/ / / Marco Colombo
___/ ___ / / Technical Manager
/ / / ESI s.r.l.
_____/ _____/ _/ Colombo(at)ESI(dot)it

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pck 2005-04-04 09:30:28 Re: ERROR: invalid page header in block 9869
Previous Message Mario Reis 2005-04-04 09:24:17 Raise Exception

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-04-04 10:09:49 Re: add_missing_from in 8.1
Previous Message Mario Reis 2005-04-04 09:24:17 Raise Exception