Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg

From: "Brandon Metcalf" <bmetcalf(at)nortel(dot)com>
To: Vlad <marchenko(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, dbdpg-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg
Date: 2005-04-08 19:26:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
m == marchenko(at)gmail(dot)com writes:

 m> Thanks for suggestion - I'm gonna try this patch:

 m> --- dbdimp.c.bak        Wed Apr  6 16:40:20 2005
 m> +++ dbdimp.c    Fri Apr  8 15:21:29 2005
 m> @@ -1415,7 +1415,7 @@
 m>         }
 m>         else if (NULL == currph->bind_type) { /* "sticky" data type */
 m>                 /* This is the default type, but we will honor
 m> defaultval if we can */
 m> -               currph->bind_type = pg_type_data(VARCHAROID);
 m> +               currph->bind_type = pg_type_data(UNKNOWNOID);
 m>                 if (!currph->bind_type)
 m>                         croak("Default type is bad!!!!???");
 m>         }

Yeah, looks good.  Let me know how it goes.  I'll try the same thing
over here.


In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Brandon MetcalfDate: 2005-04-08 20:14:53
Subject: Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg
Previous:From: VladDate: 2005-04-08 19:22:32
Subject: Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group