Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?
Date: 2003-08-19 08:18:19
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.56.0308191017140.4847@krusty.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> Now that we are in beta, does someone want to tackle a "security"
> section in the docs?

IMO, security shouldn't be a section, it should be a recurring theme
throughout all documentation material.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2003-08-19 10:08:38 Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-08-19 08:16:25 Re: Inconsistencies in our SGML output

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2003-08-19 10:08:38 Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-08-19 07:51:51 Re: set constraints docs page