On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> > The alternative is storing the charset and collation inside each string.
> > That seems like a too big price to pay, it belong in the type.
> No, the alternative you're proposing is too big a price to pay.
So you want to expand every string with 8 bytes (two oid's)?
Or special case the storing in tables so that you only store the text and
not the charset/collation info?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Markus Bertheau||Date: 2004-10-30 21:55:48|
|Subject: Re: array_to_column function|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-10-30 21:24:10|
|Subject: Re: Charset/collate support and function parameters |