Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?

From: Michael Pohl <pgsql(at)newtopia(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
Date: 2003-09-15 16:05:24
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0309151154220.10153-100000@server1.techplant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Alexey Borzov wrote:

> Michael Pohl wrote:
>
> > As a side note, I appreciate the PgSQL community's apparent commitment to
> > avoid both FUD and overstatement of PgSQL's capabilities.
>
> If you look closely at my list, it has no overstatements. It has no
> false statements either, everything can be backed up by appropriate links.

I did not mean to imply that your list contained overstatements. I was
making a general statement about the tone I've noticed on the PgSQL
mailing lists and web site, vs. what I've noticed in other projects. I
apologize for not being clear.

michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-09-15 16:39:19 Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
Previous Message Alexey Borzov 2003-09-15 14:42:47 Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?