Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch to be verbose about being unable to read

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to be verbose about being unable to read
Date: 2003-06-21 12:50:15
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0306211430320.1882-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Sean Chittenden writes:

> Agreed, though one train of thought is that if someone did put a
> .pgpass file in place that isn't readable, it should be known that
> their efforts are being wasted in vein.

I tried making several dot-files I found in my home directory unreadable
(or unsearchable, in case of a directory): acrorc, antrc, bashrc, cvsrc,
fetchmailrc, inputrc, licq, mozilla, psqlrc, rpmmacros, Xmodmap, xemacs,
xmms.  Bash gave me warning, fetchmail gave me an error (which is
reasonable, because fetchmail doesn't work without configuration), and the
rest just ignored the file.

Open password and private key files might give different results, but as
far as unreadable files go, I say ignore them.

Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Dennis Bj├ÂrklundDate: 2003-06-21 15:26:42
Subject: Patch for psql to avoid altering the PGresult strings
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2003-06-21 04:20:03
Subject: Re: connectby(... pos_of_sibling)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group