| From: | Ed Carp <erc(at)pobox(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, <postgresql(dot)org!pgadmin-support(at)adsl-61-76-31(dot)pns(dot)bellsouth(dot)net>, <postgresql(dot)org!pgsql-announce(at)adsl-61-76-31(dot)pns(dot)bellsouth(dot)net>, Alexandre Dulaunoy <alexandre(dot)dulaunoy(at)ael(dot)be> |
| Subject: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] pgAdmin Licencing Changes |
| Date: | 2003-05-22 07:45:42 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0305220243140.7480-100000@arwen.pns.bellsouth.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgadmin-support pgsql-announce |
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> - Previous versions of pgAdmin II will be retroactively relicenced under
> the Artistic Licence AND the pgAdmin Public Licence.
If by this you mean that existing versions of pgAdmin II already
distributed will be relicensed, I'm not sure that action is lawful.
Generally speaking, unilaterally attempting to change an already
distributed product to another license, regardless if that license is more
or less restrictive, has little if any basis in either law or court cases.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-05-22 07:56:59 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] pgAdmin Licencing Changes |
| Previous Message | frank_lupo | 2003-05-22 06:31:07 | pga2: fix problem |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-22 21:43:55 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] pgAdmin Licencing Changes |
| Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2003-05-21 17:48:56 | Re: ENCODING (Unicode) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-22 21:43:55 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] pgAdmin Licencing Changes |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-05-21 19:45:20 | PostgreSQL Weekly News - May 21st 2003 |