Tom Lane writes:
> BTW, the Red Hat RHDB group has spent a fair amount of time rethinking
> the overall organization of the docs and trying to organize 'em in a
> more logical order. They'd like to contribute that work back so they
> don't have to maintain a variant version of the docs. Is this a good
> time to think about looking over what they've done?
Yes, we shall use them as an example of how not to do it.
I spend quite some time today to analyze their documentation arrangement,
but it doesn't make sense to me. There are a couple of obvious
rearrangements and a couple of things we could think about if they were
briefly explained, but overall it looks pretty confused, to say it nicely.
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-01-04 16:05:06|
|Subject: Re: Documentation in book length |
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2003-01-04 10:32:28|
|Subject: Re: status of 7.3 docs?|