Re: Documentation in book length

Tom Lane writes:

> BTW, the Red Hat RHDB group has spent a fair amount of time rethinking
> the overall organization of the docs and trying to organize 'em in a
> more logical order. They'd like to contribute that work back so they
> don't have to maintain a variant version of the docs. Is this a good
> time to think about looking over what they've done?

Yes, we shall use them as an example of how not to do it.

I spend quite some time today to analyze their documentation arrangement,
but it doesn't make sense to me. There are a couple of obvious
rearrangements and a couple of things we could think about if they were
briefly explained, but overall it looks pretty confused, to say it nicely.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net