Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] PATCH SSL_pending() checks in libpq/fe-misc.c

From: <jack(at)floatingdoghead(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH SSL_pending() checks in libpq/fe-misc.c
Date: 2002-06-13 21:41:17
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

I've attached the original source file that I modified, my modified
version, and the output from 'diff -c fe-misc.c fe-misc.c.jack'.

Lack of CVS tags makes this the best way for me to get this to you.

Let me know if you need anything else.

I am no longer pursuing a total non-blocking implementation.  I haven't
found a good way to test it with the type of work that I do with
PostgreSQL.  I do use blocking SSL sockets with this mod and have had no
problem whatsoever.  The bug that I fixed in this patch is exceptionally
hard to reproduce reliably.



Jack Bates
Portland, OR, USA

Got privacy?
My PGP key:

Attachment: diff-c
Description: text/plain (1.5 KB)
Attachment: fe-misc.c.jack
Description: text/plain (21.7 KB)
Attachment: fe-misc.c
Description: text/plain (21.1 KB)

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2002-06-13 21:45:14
Subject: Re: Making serial survive pg_dump
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-06-13 21:41:07
Subject: Re: Making serial survive pg_dump

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-06-14 00:29:29
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] First cut at SSL documentation
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2002-06-13 21:25:49
Subject: Table Function (aka SRF) doc patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group